Tentatio

struggle, spirituality, absurdity

Why Bush, Huckabee, and Other Evangelicals are Wrong. Period.

This is a response – among many, I’m sure – to evangelical politicians who are intent on “Taking this nation back for Christ.”

1. This nation was never a “Christian” nation.
    Thomas Jefferson was a deist who was interested in the ethics taught by Jesus and preferred to dismiss spiritual claims. John Locke and others from whom the Founding Fathers developed their ideas for the United States held similar religious understandings. They had no intention of founding a religious nation, especially considering the fact that they kicked their former ruler out who made that claim.

2. Jesus and the early church leaders had little to do with politics.
    Well, that’s only half true. When they did interact with politics, it usually ended with their execution. This is Rome, after all. What really chaps my ass is that not only did they distance themselves from the government (most of the time, anyway), when Emperor Constantine made Christianity the state religion, many scholars would say that this was, in fact, a highly destructive move for the Christians (see Hauerwas/Willimon specifically).
    Once political power (and therefore money) entered the game, corruption spread through the church faster than the plague. Granted, the plague was usually right behind.

3. The Christian Scriptures are highly critical of wealth and power.
    The writers understood very well that it is easy to corrupt people. Here I would like to point out that it has corrupted many self-proclaimed evangelicals in government offices, but that implies they weren’t corrupt before taking office. I’m not entirely sure that is an accurate statement, and thus I will refrain.

4. Notable Christians in history are usually notable BECAUSE they rebelled against authority.
    After all, Jesus pissed a lot of people off which got him killed. Martin Luther should have been executed but escaped the wrath of the Holy Roman Empire and the Roman Catholic church a few times.
    Martin Luther King, Jr. challenged an authority that OVERTLY CLAIMED TO BE CHRISTIAN. He was assassinated. Soren Kierkegaard fought against the established church his entire life. Honestly, the list goes on.

My point: Many of the most highly regarded Christians throughout history have their status because they opposed corrupted power. Rarely do heroes stand on the side of power. Why? Be cause power always corrupts.

Huckabee, Bush, Cheney, Rice, Robertson, etc – you have all missed the point, and your corruption is bringing the demise and death of many, many people.

Oh, yeah, and you’re pissing off the rest of the world. That’s a bit more serious than some idiot blogger.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Be Sociable, Share!

4 Comments

  1. Can you prove this statement “Thomas Jefferson was a deist who was interested in the ethics taught by Jesus and preferred to dismiss spiritual claims. John Locke and others from whom the Founding Fathers developed their ideas for the United States held similar religious understandings”
    I don’t think you have done any research from public documents to write this. In other words your writings seem full of lies. You need to spend some time doing some serious reading. Go to the congress library.

  2. The work in question is called “the life and morals of Jesus.” Jefferson redacted all mention of supernatural things. It is occasionally called “the Jefferson bible.”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible has a nice entry, and at the bottom there are multiple links to the text itself. A cursory glance at the textual links will show you what I mean.

  3. We have as a society so hagiographed Jefferson that we forget that: he was a deist, not a believer in the Triune God or salvation in Christ; he was a privileged landed gentryman, with no concern for including the lowest classes in the benefits of government; he operated under the assumptions of the misnamed Enlightenment, which posited that humanity needed only perfecting, not purifying; and that he came in the train of the political writers of said enlightenment, who advocated the idea of “rights,” which we accept uncritically but to our peril, as “rights” are not a biblical thing (Righteousness is).

  4. (Please note: the term to use is not “P ______ O__”, but “displeased” or “provoked” or other decent English verb.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2019 Tentatio

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑